Infosys’ SEZ Strategy: Leveraging Section 10AA for Tax Efficiency

Infosys stands as a global leader in IT services, a testament to India’s prowess in the technology sector. A cornerstone of its onshore delivery model, particularly within India, involves strategically established development centers located in Special Economic Zones (SEZs). These zones offer a compelling array of incentives, most notably substantial income-tax exemptions under Section 10AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This case study delves into how Infosys has meticulously leveraged its SEZ units not merely for operational efficiency but also as a powerful tool for legal tax planning, optimizing its effective tax rate, and reinvesting profits strategically. We will explore the mechanics of these tax holidays, quantify their significant impact, and discuss the evolving landscape that shapes such corporate tax strategies.

1. What is Section 10AA?

Section 10AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, represents a pivotal incentive designed to stimulate economic growth, boost exports, and encourage infrastructure development within India’s Special Economic Zones. This provision offers a phased income tax deduction on profits derived from the export of articles or things, or from services, by an SEZ unit. Specifically, it provides:

100% deduction of export-linked profits for the first 5 consecutive assessment years from the year of commencement of operations. This provides a complete tax holiday on eligible profits during the initial growth phase of the unit.
50% deduction of export-linked profits for the next 5 consecutive assessment years. This period offers a partial but still substantial tax relief, allowing businesses to continue benefiting from the SEZ framework.
An additional 50% deduction for a further 5 consecutive assessment years, provided the profits are transferred to a “SEZ Re-investment Reserve Account” and subsequently utilized for the acquisition of new plant and machinery. This clause encourages reinvestment within the SEZ ecosystem, linking tax benefits directly to capital expenditure and expansion.

The primary purpose behind enacting Section 10AA was to attract foreign and domestic investment into SEZs, foster a robust export-oriented manufacturing and services base, and ultimately contribute to India’s economic development. For IT services firms like Infosys, which generate substantial export-oriented revenue, Section 10AA has historically been a cornerstone of their domestic tax planning.

2. Infosys’ SEZ Footprint & Commencement Timeline

Infosys has strategically established numerous SEZ units across India, distributing its operational footprint to maximize the benefits offered by these zones. This widespread presence reflects a deliberate strategy to leverage geographical advantages alongside tax incentives. A snapshot of some of Infosys’ key SEZ locations and their commencement timelines illustrates this approach:

SEZ Location	Commencement (FY)	Full 10AA Exemption Until (Approx.)
Mahindra City, Chennai (Unit 1)	2006	FY 2020
Chandigarh	2007	FY 2021
Mangalore	2008	FY 2022
Pune	2008	FY 2022
Thiruvananthapuram	2010	FY 2024
Mysore, Hyderabad, Chennai (Unit 2)	2011	FY 2025

Export to Sheets

Note: The “Full 10AA Exemption Until” column indicates the end of the initial 100% deduction period, assuming continuous eligibility and operation.

These SEZ units encompass a broad spectrum of Infosys’ operations, including core IT services, software development, and Business Process Management (BPM) operations. At its peak, Infosys reported a significant portion of its revenue originating from these tax-advantaged zones. For instance, Infosys’ annual reports indicate that at one point, approximately 17% of its total revenue was derived from SEZs. Furthermore, another ~13% of its revenue came from Software Technology Parks (STPs), which historically enjoyed similar tax shelters under Section 10A and 10B of the Income Tax Act. This combined exposure to tax-incentivized zones underscored a substantial part of Infosys’ onshore delivery strategy.

3. Magnitude of Tax Savings

The financial impact of Section 10AA benefits on Infosys’ profitability has been substantial, directly contributing to a lower effective tax rate and boosting net income. Infosys’ financial filings consistently highlight the significant reduction in tax expenses attributed to these SEZ incentives.

According to various financial disclosures, including SEC filings and reports:

In FY 2024, Infosys reported that SEZ incentives reduced its tax expenses by approximately US $362 million.
Similarly, in FY 2023, the tax savings from SEZ units amounted to US $362 million.
In FY 2022, these incentives provided an even higher tax reduction of around US $395 million.

Looking at earlier periods, Infosys consistently realized annual tax savings ranging from approximately US $346 million to US $386 million. These figures are particularly pivotal when considering the prevailing Indian corporate tax rates during those periods. For much of this time, the standard corporate tax rate in India hovered around 35% (before surcharges and cess). Even in more recent years, such as FY 2024, the standard corporate tax rate for companies not opting for the new concessional regime was around 25.17%. Therefore, these annual savings represented a significant portion of what Infosys would otherwise have paid in corporate taxes, directly enhancing its profitability and cash flow.

4. How the Mechanism Works in Infosys’ Model

Infosys’ utilization of Section 10AA is a classic example of how large corporations engage in legitimate tax planning by adhering to the specific conditions laid out in tax legislation. The mechanism operates in a structured manner:

Firstly, Infosys’ SEZ units actively generate export-linked profits. These profits are derived from the IT services and BPM operations provided to overseas clients, which are considered “exports” from the SEZ.

During the initial eligible years (the first 10 years of operation for each unit), Infosys’ SEZ units claim the full 100% or 50% deduction on these export profits. This directly reduces their taxable income.

However, Section 10AA also includes a crucial provision for the latter part of the tax holiday. Specifically, under Section 10AA(2), for the additional 5-year period (years 11-15), the 50% deduction is contingent upon a specific condition: the eligible profits must be transferred to a “SEZ Re-investment Reserve Account.” Infosys diligently follows this requirement. Their financial reports, including those cited by Moneycontrol, indicate that Infosys consistently posts eligible profits into such a reserve.

Subsequently, these funds held in the SEZ Re-investment Reserve are strategically utilized. Infosys primarily deploys these reserves to acquire new plant and machinery. These are depreciable assets essential for their ongoing operations and technological upgrades. By using the reserve for capital expenditure, Infosys not only fulfills the condition for the additional 50% deduction but also invests in enhancing its operational capacity and efficiency. This effectively reduces their book income and further optimizes their tax position.

It is important to note that the tax mechanism also includes safeguards. If Infosys fails to utilize the amounts transferred to the reinvestment reserve within the stipulated timelines (typically three years from the end of the financial year in which the reserve was created), the unutilized amount becomes taxable in the year following the expiry of the three-year period. This ensures that the incentive genuinely promotes reinvestment and growth within the SEZ.

5. Rationale: Why Infosys Uses SEZ Units

Infosys’ decision to establish and operate numerous SEZ units stems from a multifaceted strategic rationale, extending beyond mere tax savings. These zones offer a compelling combination of advantages that align with the company’s long-term objectives:

Cost Optimization: The most immediate and quantifiable benefit is the substantial tax savings. As highlighted, annual savings often exceeded US $350 million. These savings directly boost Infosys’ profit margins. In a highly competitive global IT services market, even marginal cost advantages can significantly enhance competitiveness and shareholder value.
Strategic Asset Deployment: The requirement to reinvest profits into plant and machinery under Section 10AA(2) is not a burden for Infosys; rather, it aligns with its continuous need for technological upgrades and capacity expansion. The company strategically allocates these tax-advantaged funds to acquire high-efficiency technology infrastructure, state-of-the-art development tools, and modern facilities. This ensures that the tax benefits translate into tangible operational improvements and future growth capabilities.
Regulatory Reliability and Predictability: Historically, SEZ legislation in India has offered a relatively stable and predictable regulatory environment for tax incentives. For a large multinational corporation like Infosys, this predictability is invaluable for long-term financial planning and investment decisions. The clear framework of Section 10AA allowed Infosys to forecast its tax liabilities and plan its capital expenditure with a higher degree of certainty, fostering a competitive advantage.
Infrastructure and Ecosystem: SEZs often come with ready-made infrastructure, including reliable power, connectivity, and dedicated administrative support. This reduces the logistical complexities and setup costs associated with establishing large development centers, further contributing to operational efficiency. Moreover, these zones tend to attract a skilled talent pool, which is crucial for IT services firms.
Export Promotion: Fundamentally, SEZs were designed to promote exports. By operating within these zones, Infosys directly contributes to India’s export revenues, aligning its business objectives with national economic priorities.

6. Risks and Changing Landscape

While Section 10AA has provided significant benefits, the landscape for SEZ units and their tax incentives is dynamic and subject to various risks and policy shifts. Infosys, like other major IT firms, has had to adapt to these changes:

Sunsetting of SEZ Units: The most significant inherent risk is the sunsetting of tax holidays. Section 10AA benefits are time-bound. Once individual SEZ units cross their initial 10-year period (for 100% and 50% deductions) and subsequently the additional 5-year reinvestment period, the tax shields disappear. For instance, Infosys’ Mahindra City, Chennai (Unit 1), which commenced operations in FY 2006, saw its full 10AA exemption period expire around FY 2020. As more of Infosys’ older SEZ units reach their respective sunset dates (as indicated in the timeline above), the proportion of revenue eligible for these deductions naturally declines. This necessitates a continuous recalibration of tax strategy.
Corporate Tax Reform (Section 115BAA): A major policy shift occurred with the introduction of Section 115BAA in 2019. This provision offered a concessional corporate tax rate of 22% (plus surcharge and cess) for domestic companies, provided they forgo certain exemptions and deductions, including those under Section 10AA. This presented a strategic dilemma for companies like Infosys: continue benefiting from SEZ exemptions (which were expiring for older units anyway) or switch to a lower, simpler base tax rate. Infosys, recognizing the long-term trend towards simpler taxation and the sunsetting of its older SEZ units, strategically opted for Section 115BAA in FY 2025 (as reported by India Infoline and confirmed in its SEC filings). This move, while increasing the effective tax rate for some operations, provided greater tax certainty and reduced compliance complexity.
Policy Shifts and Curtailment: Beyond 115BAA, ongoing budget reforms and policy discussions have indicated a broader intent to curtail SEZ privileges for new units. For instance, the government has signaled that units commencing operations after April 2020 or 2021 might not be eligible for the same extensive tax holidays, or new SEZ frameworks might be introduced. This impacts future expansion plans within SEZs.
GAAR & BEPS Scrutiny: India’s General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) and international initiatives like the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project impose stringent requirements. Transactions within SEZ units and with related parties must pass arm’s-length and substance tests. This means that the primary purpose of the transaction must be genuine economic activity, not merely tax avoidance. Infosys, as a multinational entity, operates under constant scrutiny to ensure its tax planning strategies are robust and comply with these anti-avoidance provisions.

7. Financial Impact on Effective Tax Rate

The strategic decisions regarding SEZ units and the adoption of new tax regimes have profoundly impacted Infosys’ Effective Tax Rate (ETR). The ETR represents the average rate at which a company is taxed on its pre-tax profits.

Pre-115BAA Era: In the era dominated by Section 10AA benefits, Infosys’ effective tax rate was significantly sub-statutory. While the standard corporate tax rate in India hovered around 35%, Infosys’ ETR, due to substantial SEZ deductions, often ranged between 20-25%. This lower ETR directly translated into higher net profits and stronger earnings per share, making the company more attractive to investors. The tax savings were a direct contributor to its financial performance.
Post-115BAA (FY 2025 onwards): With Infosys’ strategic decision to adopt Section 115BAA in FY 2025, the company effectively forfeited the remaining Section 10AA benefits for its eligible units. Consequently, its operations are now taxed at the lower base rate of 22% (plus applicable surcharge and cess). This means that while the headline rate is lower, the effective tax rate for some operations that previously enjoyed significant 10AA deductions might have marginally increased compared to their fully tax-exempt status.

This transition highlights a crucial strategic pivot: Infosys chose tax certainty and simplicity at a marginally higher effective rate (for some operations) over complex, variable exemptions that were, in any case, sunsetting. This move aligns with a broader industry trend where companies prefer a stable, lower corporate tax regime over a fragmented system of expiring incentives. Investors closely monitor these changes, as they directly influence future profitability and cash flow projections.

8. Broader Lessons & Comparative Insights

Infosys’ journey with Section 10AA and its subsequent pivot offers valuable lessons for businesses navigating tax incentives and evolving regulatory landscapes:

Strategic Planning is Key: Section 10AA exemplifies legitimate tax planning. It relies on companies fulfilling specific conditions, such as capital expenditure reinvestment, to earn tax benefits. This is fundamentally different from tax avoidance, which seeks to circumvent legal provisions. Firms must meticulously plan their investments and operations to align with such incentives.
Lifecycle Management is Crucial: Tax holidays are not perpetual. Businesses must anticipate the “sunsetting” of benefits for individual units. This requires a proactive lifecycle management approach to tax strategy, identifying when benefits will expire and planning for the resulting increase in tax liability. Companies must continuously assess their portfolio of tax-advantaged units.
Policy Agility is Paramount: The shift from a high-tax-with-exemptions regime to a lower-tax-without-exemptions regime (like 115BAA) demonstrates the need for corporate agility. Infosys’ decision to switch reflects its readiness to adapt to macro tax reforms, prioritizing long-term stability and simplicity.
GAAR Safeguards Ensure Substance: The existence of GAAR ensures that tax planning remains within legal and economic substance. Companies cannot simply create structures solely for tax benefits without underlying genuine business activity. This reinforces the need for robust operational models within SEZs.
Comparative Calculus: Other major Indian IT service providers, such as Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) and Wipro, face a similar calculus. Their decisions regarding SEZ timelines and the adoption of Section 115BAA reflect their individual SEZ portfolios, capital expenditure plans, and overall tax strategies. Analyzing their effective tax rates and disclosures provides comparative insights into how the industry is collectively adapting to these changes.

9. Hypothetical Case Study Walkthrough

To further illustrate the financial impact, let’s simulate a scenario for a hypothetical SEZ unit generating ₹1,000 crore in export profit in its 6th year of operation (i.e., after the initial 5 years of 100% deduction):

Scenario A – Utilizing SEZ Reserve & Section 10AA (as per old regime)

Eligible Deduction: In its 6th year, the unit is eligible for a 50% deduction of its export profit.
- Tax-exempt profit = 50% of ₹1,000 crore = ₹500 crore.
Taxable Profit (before additional deduction): The remaining ₹500 crore would be taxable.
Reinvestment Clause (for years 11-15): If this were years 11-15, the unit would need to route the remaining 50% of its profit (₹500 crore) into a SEZ Re-investment Reserve. This reserve would then be used to purchase new plant and machinery within a stipulated period.
Ultimate Tax Outcome (if reinvested): Assuming the conditions for the additional 50% deduction (i.e., reinvestment) are met, the unit could ultimately achieve zero net tax on the entire ₹1,000 crore profit for that year (barring any exceptions or unutilized reserves). This highlights the power of the reinvestment clause in extending tax benefits.

Scenario B – Opting for Section 115BAA (New Concessional Rate)

Taxable Profit: If the company opts for Section 115BAA, the entire ₹1,000 crore export profit becomes taxable.
Tax Rate: This profit would be taxed at the concessional rate of 22% (before surcharge and cess).
- Tax liability = 22% of ₹1,000 crore = ₹220 crore (before surcharge & cess).
No Reinvestment Requirement: Crucially, under 115BAA, there is no requirement to reinvest profits into plant and machinery to avail the lower tax rate. The company gains full flexibility over its cash flow.

Outcome: A firm must carefully forecast its capital expenditure plans and strategic needs. If a company has substantial and continuous plans for capital expenditure that align with the reinvestment requirements, leveraging the full 10AA benefit (including the additional 50%) might be more beneficial. However, if capital expenditure plans are uncertain, or if the company prioritizes cash flow flexibility and simpler compliance, opting for the lower, flat rate under Section 115BAA becomes a more attractive choice. Infosys’ move to 115BAA indicates a strategic shift towards the latter, prioritizing certainty and flexibility as its older SEZ units age out of their full tax holiday periods.

10. Conclusion & Future Outlook

Infosys has masterfully maximized the benefits of Section 10AA for its SEZ units over many years, realizing hundreds of millions of dollars in annual tax savings. This strategic utilization of a government incentive has significantly contributed to its robust financial performance and ability to invest in cutting-edge technology infrastructure.

However, the company’s recent strategic pivot to Section 115BAA reflects a broader industry trend. Businesses are increasingly favoring predictable, simpler taxation over complex, time-bound exemptions. As Infosys’ older SEZ units continue to age out of their tax holiday periods, the company will likely focus its domestic growth strategies on new non-SEZ scale-ups and further aligning its global tax posture.

From an investor’s perspective, it becomes crucial to closely monitor Infosys’ disclosures regarding its capital expenditure plans, margin stability, and, most importantly, its effective tax rate. These factors will provide key insights into how the company continues to manage its tax liabilities and maintain its competitive edge in a constantly evolving global tax environment.

Suggested Reading & References

Infosys 20-F Filing FY 2024: (Refer to relevant sections on tax deductions and SEZ benefits, often found in the Notes to Financial Statements, specifically regarding income taxes.) – Actual data cited from public filings, e.g., Stock Titan, SEC archives.
Infosys Annual Report FY 2010: (For details on SEZ revenue share and strategic importance.) – Actual data cited from Infosys’ historical annual reports.
Infosys Annual Report FY 2011: (For more detailed SEZ unit commencement timelines.) – Actual data cited from Infosys’ historical annual reports.
SEC 20-F FY 2025: (For confirmation of adoption of Section 115BAA and its implications.) – Actual data cited from Infosys’ public SEC filings.
Infosys Annual Report FY 2018: (For insights into the usage of the SEZ reinvestment reserve.) – Actual data cited from Infosys’ historical annual reports, e.g., Stock Titan.
India Infoline / Moneycontrol: (For news and analysis on Infosys’ tax strategy and switch to 115BAA.) – General financial news sources often report on these corporate decisions.

Call to Action

Feel free to share this comprehensive case study with colleagues in tax, finance, or strategy roles. If you’d like a more detailed slide deck, Excel models for tax impact analysis, or a comparative study including other major IT firms like Tata Consultancy Services or Wipro, just ask! CA Sweta Makwana & Associates provides expert guidance on complex tax planning and financial strategy for businesses of all sizes.